H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 1-1
Gisela Dulko and Nicole Vaidisova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2008 Berlin second round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Nicole Vaidisova | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2005* | Bangkok | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 3-6 6-0 7-6(3) | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |