H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Sandra Kleinova H2H: 1-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Kleinova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2003 Estoril third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2003* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gisela Dulko | 6-4 6-4 | Sandra Kleinova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sandra Kleinova | #759 | #41 | 606 | 1,633 | 59 | 119 | 33.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Sandra Kleinova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #128 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #42 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–20 | 13.0% | #163 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #127 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #121 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #145 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |