H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro H2H: 1-1
Gisela Dulko and Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro leads 1–0 on clay, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro won the 2009 Strasbourg fourth round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2009* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | #183 | #61 | 760 | 1,599 | 44 | 80 | 35.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #68 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #112 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #122 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |