H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 1-2
Sybille Bammer holds a 2–1 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2007 Portoroz quarterfinal 7-6(3) 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2007* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 7-6(3) 1-6 6-1 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
| May 16, 2007* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sybille Bammer | 7-5 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2007* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Gisela Dulko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Sybille Bammer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |