H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gisela Dulko vs Tatiana Poutchek H2H: 1-0
Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Tatiana Poutchek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2008 Guangzhou third round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 47
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2008* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | Tatiana Poutchek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Tatiana Poutchek | #1,078 | #55 | 609 | 1,626 | 51 | 101 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gisela Dulko | Tatiana Poutchek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #734 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #86 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #100 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #121 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #94 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |