H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Robin White H2H: 1-1
Hana Mandlikova and Robin White are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Robin White leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robin White won the 1986 Eastbourne fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Robin White | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-0 4-6 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Robin White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |