H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Heather Watson vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 0-6

Victoria Azarenka holds a 6–0 lead over Heather Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Victoria Azarenka leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Victoria Azarenka won the 2018 Indian Wells first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Watson
GBR Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
BLR Age 36 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 2018* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Victoria Azarenka #204 6-4 6-2 Heather Watson #70 Match data
Jul 9, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Victoria Azarenka #683 3-6 6-1 6-4 Heather Watson #102 Match data
Aug 8, 2014* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Victoria Azarenka #11 6-2 6-4 Heather Watson #57 Match data
Mar 22, 2012* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Victoria Azarenka #1 6-0 6-2 Heather Watson #129 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Victoria Azarenka #3 6-1 6-0 Heather Watson #105 Match data
Jun 18, 2010* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Victoria Azarenka #15 6-1 6-1 Heather Watson #344 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Heather Watson #470 #38 1,386 1,755 144 195 42.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Victoria Azarenka #449 #1 10,955 2,203 575 266 68.4% 2 10 0 6 3 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Watson Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,815 0 0
18 2010 1–5 16.7% #176 1,472 0 0 2008 38–19 66.7% #15 1,870 0 0
19 2011 10–11 47.6% #92 1,537 0 0 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,933 0 3
20 2012 17–16 51.5% #49 1,690 0 1 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,945 0 5
21 2013 9–16 36.0% #121 1,550 0 1 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,003 0 8
22 2014 9–17 34.6% #49 1,555 0 1 2012 64–11 85.3% #1 2,134 1 14
23 2015 18–19 48.6% #55 1,614 0 2 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,068 2 17
24 2016 15–18 45.5% #76 1,584 0 3 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,946 2 17
25 2017 13–14 48.1% #73 1,626 0 3 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,954 2 17
26 2018 10–16 38.5% #91 1,584 0 3 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 1,979 2 20
27 2019 5–10 33.3% #103 1,622 0 3 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 1,962 2 20
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #58 1,663 0 4 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,873 2 20
29 2021 7–16 30.4% #72 1,590 0 4 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,846 2 20
30 2022 9–12 42.9% #139 1,569 0 4 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,966 2 21
31 2023 8–7 53.3% #137 1,598 0 4 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 1,977 2 21
32 2024 3–6 33.3% #162 1,570 0 4 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,921 2 21
33 2025 1–3 25.0% #269 1,545 0 4 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,779 2 21
34 2026 0–1 0.0% #470 1,592 0 4 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,895 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,828 2 21