H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Helen Gourlay vs Almut Sturm H2H: 2-0
Helen Gourlay holds a 2–0 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helen Gourlay leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Helen Gourlay won the 1969 Poertschach quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1969* | Poertschach | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Helen Gourlay | 6-1 6-3 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1968* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helen Gourlay | 9-7 3-6 6-2 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Gourlay | — | — | — | 1,962 | 294 | 200 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Gourlay | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 48–21 | 69.6% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 42–22 | 65.6% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 34–25 | 57.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1975 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 9 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 9 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1977 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,892 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |