H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Iga Swiatek vs Amanda Anisimova H2H: 1-2
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–1 lead over Iga Swiatek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Iga Swiatek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 WTA Finals quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 25
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2025* | WTA Finals | WTA Finals | QF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | Iga Swiatek | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | QF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-4 6-3 | Iga Swiatek | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2025 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Iga Swiatek | 6-0 6-0 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | #8 | #1 | 11,695 | 2,284 | 322 | 84 | 79.3% | 6 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 25 |
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Amanda Anisimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #60 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 13–5 | 72.2% | #17 | 1,863 | 1 | 1 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2021 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,946 | 1 | 3 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2022 | 65–9 | 87.8% | #1 | 2,167 | 3 | 11 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 17 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 50–8 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,216 | 5 | 22 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2025 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #2 | 2,143 | 6 | 25 | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2026 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,046 | 6 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |