H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Iga Swiatek vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 2-0
Iga Swiatek holds a 2–0 lead over Angelique Kerber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iga Swiatek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iga Swiatek won the 2024 Rome fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 25
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Iga Swiatek | 7-5 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Mar 16, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Iga Swiatek | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | #8 | #1 | 11,695 | 2,284 | 322 | 84 | 79.3% | 6 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 25 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iga Swiatek | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #60 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 13–5 | 72.2% | #17 | 1,863 | 1 | 1 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #9 | 1,946 | 1 | 3 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 65–9 | 87.8% | #1 | 2,167 | 3 | 11 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 67–11 | 85.9% | #1 | 2,214 | 4 | 17 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 50–8 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,216 | 5 | 22 | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #2 | 2,143 | 6 | 25 | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,046 | 6 | 25 | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |