H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC

Iga Swiatek vs Kaia Kanepi H2H: 1-0

Iga Swiatek holds a 1–0 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iga Swiatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iga Swiatek won the 2022 Australian Open quarterfinal 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3.

Poland Age 25 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Iga Swiatek #9 4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 Kaia Kanepi #115 Match data Jan 27, 2022* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Iga Swiatek #8 #1 11,695 2,287 347 90 79.4% 6 12 1 6 1 26
Kaia Kanepi — #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Iga Swiatek Kaia Kanepi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2019 14–11 56.0% #60 1,744 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2020 13–5 72.2% #17 1,863 1 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0
20 2021 36–15 70.6% #9 1,936 1 3 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0
21 2022 65–9 87.8% #1 2,165 3 11 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0
22 2023 67–11 85.9% #1 2,224 4 17 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0
23 2024 55–9 85.9% #2 2,208 5 22 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0
24 2025 58–16 78.4% #2 2,143 6 25 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0
25 2026 39–14 73.6% #8 2,095 6 26 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,799 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,862 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,732 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,777 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,762 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4
36 — — — — — — — 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Iga Swiatek Kaia Kanepi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2019 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 7 1 8 87.5% — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2021 20 11 31 64.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2022 45 7 52 86.5% 18 1 19 94.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2023 41 7 48 85.4% 19 2 21 90.5% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2024 27 6 33 81.8% 26 2 28 92.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2025 37 11 48 77.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 10 1 11 90.9% — — — — 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2026 28 8 36 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 211 60 271 77.9% 109 19 128 85.2% 27 11 38 71.1% — — — — — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 411/437 of Iga Swiatek's and 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Iga Swiatek Kaia Kanepi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2019 25/25 3.6 3.2 54.2% 64.5% 50.8% 54.2% 49.8% 58.2% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 18/18 1.9 2.3 57.8% 63.8% 53.6% 54.6% 46.5% 59.4% 48.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2021 47/51 2.6 2.5 57.0% 70.7% 53.6% 51.5% 43.7% 63.4% 46.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2022 74/74 2.0 2.1 65.4% 68.3% 53.3% 55.3% 53.4% 62.9% 51.5% 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7%
22 2023 74/78 1.6 1.6 65.3% 71.0% 56.2% 49.1% 59.0% 66.0% 53.0% 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6%
23 2024 57/64 2.0 1.5 65.8% 71.0% 57.1% 59.0% 48.8% 66.2% 49.4% 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8%
24 2025 63/74 3.1 3.1 61.4% 70.5% 49.0% 57.0% 53.8% 62.4% 49.5% 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8%
25 2026 53/53 1.6 2.9 66.9% 68.6% 51.7% 58.4% 53.3% 62.8% 49.8% 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7%
Career — 411/437 2.2 2.3 63.0% 69.4% 53.4% 54.9% 52.2% 63.4% 49.8% — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Iga Swiatek Kaia Kanepi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03
18 2019 1745 132.7 +0.77 +1.74 1.084 51.8% -28 -78 — 51.7% +0.22 6–4 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 102.2 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 1864 147.1 +2.15 +3.63 1.204 54.0% -102 -28 — 71.1% +1.58 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.06 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19
20 2021 1937 156.2 +5.89 +3.79 1.261 54.4% -81 +86 -187 67.6% +1.32 5–5 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.2 +0.86 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
21 2022 2166 172.9 +6.26 +8.30 1.388 57.0% +1 +38 -403 79.6% +2.40 16–5 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 104.9 -0.64 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19
22 2023 2225 175.7 +8.79 +10.09 1.558 59.3% +33 +59 -314 83.0% +2.76 9–6 (60%) 10–4 (71%) 102.0 -1.15 2007 1582 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +15 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +0.14
23 2024 2208 173.7 +8.58 +7.08 1.463 57.5% +22 +181 -245 80.5% +2.34 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 101.3 -0.33 2008 1762 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -3 -51 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.02
24 2025 2144 172.7 +5.66 +6.77 1.318 55.9% +23 +165 +94 75.2% +1.86 8–7 (53%) 7–6 (54%) 95.8 -0.40 2009 1604 134.3 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.80
25 2026 2096 168.2 +5.41 +6.98 1.337 56.1% +62 +126 +30 70.9% +1.92 8–7 (53%) 5–3 (63%) 95.9 +0.97 2010 1843 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -59 -101 -166 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -0.99
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1839 132.4 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -38 +74 -165 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1720 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +37 +80 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1660 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +50 +99 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1664 112.6 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1732 125.5 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +34 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1777 140.4 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +33 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.22
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08
Career — 2288 172.8 +6.28 +6.93 1.364 56.5% +7 +89 -132 75.0% +2.01 61–38 (62%) 41–28 (59%) 101.6 +0.01 — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +23 +4 -154 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.