H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Irina-Camelia Begu vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 2-4

Angelique Kerber holds a 4–2 lead over Irina-Camelia Begu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Angelique Kerber leads 3–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Angelique Kerber won the 2018 Rome third round 3-6 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Irina-Camelia Begu
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Angelique Kerber
GER Age 38 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 17, 2018* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Angelique Kerber #12 3-6 7-5 7-5 Irina-Camelia Begu #41 Match data
Apr 9, 2016* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Angelique Kerber #2 6-2 6-3 Irina-Camelia Begu #34 Match data
May 14, 2015* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Irina-Camelia Begu #31 6-3 6-3 Angelique Kerber #11 Match data
Apr 11, 2015* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Angelique Kerber #16 7-6(3) 7-6(4) Irina-Camelia Begu #36 Match data
Jan 21, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Irina-Camelia Begu #42 6-4 0-6 6-1 Angelique Kerber #9 Match data
Mar 6, 2013* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Angelique Kerber #6 6-3 6-2 Irina-Camelia Begu #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Irina-Camelia Begu #204 #22 1,925 1,886 249 234 51.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Angelique Kerber #205 #1 9,080 2,045 461 270 63.1% 3 0 0 10 1 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Angelique Kerber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,493 0 0 2006 1–1 50.0% #172 1,515 0 0
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #202 1,485 0 0 2007 6–10 37.5% #88 1,548 0 0
20 2011 16–11 59.3% #40 1,657 0 0 2008 7–14 33.3% #100 1,504 0 0
21 2012 22–18 55.0% #52 1,729 0 1 2009 3–6 33.3% #117 1,512 0 0
22 2013 10–17 37.0% #131 1,559 0 1 2010 23–19 54.8% #46 1,668 0 0
23 2014 14–15 48.3% #41 1,617 0 1 2011 17–20 45.9% #32 1,675 0 0
24 2015 30–20 60.0% #31 1,711 0 2 2012 57–20 74.0% #5 1,983 0 2
25 2016 25–18 58.1% #29 1,711 0 3 2013 45–22 67.2% #9 1,947 0 3
26 2017 20–22 47.6% #43 1,667 0 4 2014 43–22 66.2% #9 1,895 0 3
27 2018 19–24 44.2% #67 1,601 0 4 2015 51–22 69.9% #10 1,917 0 7
28 2019 11–16 40.7% #102 1,555 0 4 2016 54–16 77.1% #1 2,024 2 10
29 2020 5–8 38.5% #78 1,710 0 4 2017 28–23 54.9% #21 1,767 2 10
30 2021 17–15 53.1% #62 1,736 0 4 2018 43–16 72.9% #2 1,924 3 12
31 2022 25–15 62.5% #34 1,834 0 5 2019 28–19 59.6% #20 1,800 3 12
32 2023 17–14 54.8% #75 1,781 0 5 2020 7–6 53.8% #25 1,764 3 12
33 2024 10–7 58.8% #79 1,807 0 5 2021 29–15 65.9% #16 1,933 3 13
34 2025 7–9 43.8% #144 1,760 0 6 2022 13–9 59.1% #104 1,878 3 14
35 2026 1–3 25.0% #204 1,726 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — 2024 6–10 37.5% #205 1,788 3 14