H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC

Irina-Camelia Begu vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands H2H: 5-0

Irina-Camelia Begu holds a 5–0 lead over Bethanie Mattek-Sands in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Irina-Camelia Begu leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina-Camelia Begu won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 5-7 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Irina-Camelia Begu
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 2021 Dubai WTA 1000 Q1 Q Hard Irina-Camelia Begu #72 7-6(7) 4-6 6-0 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #299 Match data
May 24, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Irina-Camelia Begu #28 5-7 6-1 6-3 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #86 Match data
Apr 7, 2016* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Irina-Camelia Begu #34 6-4 4-6 6-2 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #89 Match data
May 26, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Irina-Camelia Begu #30 6-4 7-6(6) Bethanie Mattek-Sands #164 Match data
Feb 20, 2015* Rio de Janeiro WTA 250 R16 Clay Irina-Camelia Begu #34 6-2 6-4 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #214 Match data
Oct 13, 2012* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Irina-Camelia Begu #57 6-4 1-6 6-2 Bethanie Mattek-Sands #201 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Irina-Camelia Begu #204 #22 1,925 1,886 249 234 51.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Bethanie Mattek-Sands #1,356 #30 1,643 1,777 132 172 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Irina-Camelia Begu Bethanie Mattek-Sands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #343 1,471 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,470 0 0
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #234 1,493 0 0 2003 0–5 0.0% #158 1,428 0 0
19 2010 0–1 0.0% #202 1,485 0 0 2004 2–3 40.0% #172 1,447 0 0
20 2011 16–11 59.3% #40 1,657 0 0 2005 3–3 50.0% #123 1,489 0 0
21 2012 22–18 55.0% #52 1,729 0 1 2006 9–12 42.9% #126 1,572 0 0
22 2013 10–17 37.0% #131 1,559 0 1 2007 6–8 42.9% #114 1,590 0 0
23 2014 14–15 48.3% #41 1,617 0 1 2008 19–14 57.6% #39 1,700 0 0
24 2015 30–20 60.0% #31 1,711 0 2 2009 7–14 33.3% #153 1,622 0 0
25 2016 25–18 58.1% #29 1,711 0 3 2010 14–13 51.9% #58 1,702 0 0
26 2017 20–22 47.6% #43 1,667 0 4 2011 18–14 56.2% #55 1,707 0 0
27 2018 19–24 44.2% #67 1,601 0 4 2012 5–9 35.7% #169 1,666 0 0
28 2019 11–16 40.7% #102 1,555 0 4 2013 16–15 51.6% #48 1,692 0 0
29 2020 5–8 38.5% #78 1,710 0 4 2014 3–9 25.0% #177 1,611 0 0
30 2021 17–15 53.1% #62 1,736 0 4 2015 14–14 50.0% #60 1,681 0 0
31 2022 25–15 62.5% #34 1,834 0 5 2016 5–15 25.0% #178 1,579 0 0
32 2023 17–14 54.8% #75 1,781 0 5 2017 7–7 50.0% #123 1,672 0 0
33 2024 10–7 58.8% #79 1,807 0 5 2018 1–7 12.5% #350 1,600 0 0
34 2025 7–9 43.8% #144 1,760 0 6 2019 1–3 25.0% #370 1,583 0 0
35 2026 1–3 25.0% #204 1,726 0 6 2020 0–1 0.0% #338 1,605 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2021 2–2 50.0% #368 1,597 0 0
38 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #1360 1,544 0 0