H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 1-2
Andrea Petkovic holds a 2–1 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 2–0 on clay, while Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2017 Miami first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-2 6-4 | Andrea Petkovic | Match data |
| Jul 10, 2014* | Bad Gastein | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 7-6(8) 7-5 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2014* | Charleston | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Andrea Petkovic | 7-5 6-2 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Petkovic | #139 | #9 | 4,640 | 1,990 | 273 | 225 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Andrea Petkovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #10 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,857 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #43 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,826 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #24 | 1,685 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #99 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,700 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,730 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |