H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 1-1
Jana Cepelova and Chanelle Scheepers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on clay, while Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2014 Hong Kong third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2014* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-2 6-1 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2014* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Chanelle Scheepers | 7-5 6-2 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Chanelle Scheepers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |