H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs María-Teresa Torró-Flor H2H: 2-0
Jana Cepelova holds a 2–0 lead over María-Teresa Torró-Flor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Cepelova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2014 Luxembourg third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-3 6-0 | María-Teresa Torró-Flor | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | María-Teresa Torró-Flor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| María-Teresa Torró-Flor | #700 | #47 | 1,155 | 1,688 | 30 | 50 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | María-Teresa Torró-Flor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #98 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #64 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |