Jana Cepelova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annika Beck | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 23, 2017 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 24, 2016 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 2, 2019 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 30, 2017 | H2H |
| Andrea Petkovic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 23, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Shahar Peer
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jana Cepelova vs Shahar Peer.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | 6-1 6-1 | Shahar Peer | Match data | Jan 1, 2016 | Q1 | Brisbane International | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,671 | 55 | 92 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,969 | 269 | 206 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,788 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,888 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #108 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,708 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,559 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2013 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2014 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 57.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 28 | 14 | 42 | 66.7% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 32 | 14 | 46 | 69.6% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2017 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 29 | 59 | 88 | 33.0% | 19 | 23 | 42 | 45.2% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | — | — | — | — | — | 191 | 136 | 327 | 58.4% | 62 | 48 | 110 | 56.4% | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 141/147 of Jana Cepelova's and 370/469 of Shahar Peer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 86.4% | 50.9% | 11.1% | 53.8% | 25.0% | 45.5% | 40.4% | 2005 | 5/42 | 1.4 | 4.4 | 55.4% | 58.1% | 41.3% | 58.7% | 48.3% | 50.7% | 44.8% |
| 19 | 2012 | 9/10 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 66.5% | 58.4% | 44.1% | 49.8% | 44.8% | 53.6% | 45.4% | 2006 | 30/58 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 64.3% | 60.8% | 44.2% | 51.0% | 52.2% | 54.9% | 47.0% |
| 20 | 2013 | 21/21 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 64.1% | 54.6% | 39.5% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 2007 | 58/60 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 66.3% | 63.0% | 48.5% | 53.0% | 52.1% | 58.4% | 47.4% |
| 21 | 2014 | 36/37 | 1.1 | 2.3 | 67.6% | 56.9% | 44.2% | 52.4% | 51.9% | 53.1% | 45.6% | 2008 | 37/46 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 68.0% | 61.7% | 44.5% | 47.6% | 45.8% | 56.2% | 46.1% |
| 22 | 2015 | 12/15 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 69.0% | 51.6% | 43.2% | 43.7% | 42.8% | 48.3% | 40.4% | 2009 | 48/57 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 65.2% | 61.3% | 47.9% | 52.4% | 48.8% | 56.5% | 47.1% |
| 23 | 2016 | 21/21 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 64.5% | 59.8% | 43.9% | 45.0% | 50.4% | 54.1% | 43.3% | 2010 | 63/68 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 64.4% | 64.7% | 46.9% | 55.5% | 49.4% | 58.4% | 45.9% |
| 24 | 2017 | 28/29 | 1.0 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 60.1% | 38.9% | 43.3% | 43.7% | 52.2% | 42.9% | 2011 | 41/44 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 63.5% | 60.5% | 43.0% | 50.2% | 46.0% | 54.1% | 42.9% |
| 25 | 2018 | 7/7 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 64.5% | 58.3% | 43.6% | 51.6% | 51.1% | 53.2% | 42.9% | 2012 | 35/38 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 63.2% | 59.5% | 42.5% | 41.1% | 48.8% | 53.4% | 44.7% |
| 26 | 2019 | 6/6 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 62.5% | 54.9% | 37.2% | 24.8% | 54.2% | 46.8% | 44.3% | 2013 | 23/24 | 0.6 | 3.2 | 64.9% | 57.9% | 42.9% | 54.5% | 48.3% | 52.4% | 45.5% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 26/28 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 62.5% | 59.2% | 39.5% | 44.3% | 48.8% | 51.9% | 45.1% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 63.6% | 52.0% | 42.6% | 26.5% | 60.4% | 48.4% | 37.1% |
| Career | — | 141/147 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 65.4% | 57.2% | 41.7% | 46.2% | 48.8% | 51.8% | 43.6% | — | 370/475 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 64.7% | 61.4% | 45.1% | 50.5% | 49.2% | 55.7% | 45.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Shahar Peer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1510 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | — | 53.8% | -0.08 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.42 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1486 | 97.3 | +0.56 | -1.05 | 0.740 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 2005 | 1636 | 124.9 | -1.60 | +0.29 | 0.910 | 48.0% | -10 | -58 | -78 | 51.0% | -0.03 | 10–8 (56%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.4 | -0.40 |
| 19 | 2012 | 1535 | 104.0 | +0.24 | +0.88 | 0.978 | 49.6% | -13 | — | +117 | 43.5% | -0.39 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.5 | +0.42 | 2006 | 1829 | 146.6 | -0.62 | +1.81 | 1.042 | 50.8% | -41 | -7 | -266 | 61.9% | +1.04 | 11–7 (61%) | 9–9 (50%) | 104.4 | +0.31 |
| 20 | 2013 | 1511 | 109.4 | -5.00 | -1.81 | 0.840 | 45.9% | -15 | +25 | +91 | 35.4% | -1.19 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.3 | +0.41 | 2007 | 1833 | 153.0 | +2.29 | +3.68 | 1.138 | 52.8% | +7 | +25 | -154 | 63.6% | +0.84 | 6–8 (43%) | 9–4 (69%) | 101.8 | +0.52 |
| 21 | 2014 | 1599 | 124.4 | -2.47 | +1.17 | 0.972 | 49.3% | -50 | +49 | — | 48.8% | -0.24 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–2 (75%) | 105.4 | +0.63 | 2008 | 1710 | 132.5 | +0.71 | +1.58 | 1.054 | 51.1% | +42 | +32 | 0 | 52.0% | +0.17 | 7–5 (58%) | 4–5 (44%) | 98.3 | 0.00 |
| 22 | 2015 | 1575 | 106.4 | -3.91 | -1.07 | 0.783 | 44.6% | -70 | +65 | — | 35.3% | -1.18 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.09 | 2009 | 1789 | 138.4 | +1.20 | +2.73 | 1.084 | 52.0% | +30 | -85 | — | 60.5% | +0.76 | 9–4 (69%) | 8–2 (80%) | 108.3 | -0.03 |
| 23 | 2016 | 1632 | 123.6 | -1.51 | +0.12 | 0.945 | 48.8% | -32 | -37 | -17 | 44.9% | -0.35 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–1 (67%) | 101.0 | -1.31 | 2010 | 1888 | 152.7 | +2.81 | +2.91 | 1.104 | 52.2% | -10 | -19 | -200 | 62.7% | +0.97 | 14–4 (78%) | 5–6 (45%) | 106.9 | -0.29 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1627 | 118.6 | -2.44 | -0.29 | 0.898 | 47.4% | -28 | -13 | -11 | 32.8% | -1.11 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.2 | -1.67 | 2011 | 1708 | 130.0 | -0.93 | -0.58 | 0.936 | 48.7% | +54 | +67 | — | 49.5% | -0.07 | 9–4 (69%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.2 | +1.40 |
| 25 | 2018 | 1626 | 119.0 | -1.48 | -0.41 | 0.915 | 48.0% | +7 | — | — | 38.9% | -0.72 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.49 | 2012 | 1586 | 125.7 | -1.37 | +0.83 | 0.959 | 49.0% | +71 | +119 | +14 | 41.3% | -0.51 | 1–9 (10%) | 2–5 (29%) | 86.0 | -0.53 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1619 | 111.1 | -2.22 | +0.48 | 0.832 | 45.4% | +46 | -54 | — | 27.3% | -1.36 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.45 | 2013 | 1559 | 108.2 | -2.36 | -0.25 | 0.955 | 49.0% | +34 | +89 | — | 41.8% | -0.56 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +1.54 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1567 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1539 | 108.9 | -3.44 | +0.83 | 0.938 | 48.5% | +5 | +83 | +40 | 40.3% | -0.91 | 4–7 (36%) | 4–0 (100%) | 99.7 | -0.24 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1527 | 104.5 | -1.91 | -2.82 | 0.718 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.22 | 1–0 | 0–2 | — | -0.28 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1478 | 88.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 1546 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1671 | 120.4 | -2.57 | -0.05 | 0.905 | 47.7% | -30 | +17 | +41 | 40.0% | -0.75 | 23–26 (47%) | 19–14 (58%) | 104.7 | -2.37 | — | 1969 | 140.8 | +0.35 | +1.76 | 1.032 | 50.7% | +14 | +16 | -88 | 54.5% | +0.32 | 76–60 (56%) | 51–41 (55%) | 103.9 | +0.51 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Shahar Peer
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 7 | 3 | 10 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 24, 2011 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 3 | 4 | 7 | Oct 9, 2014 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jun 25, 2014 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 29, 2013 | H2H |