H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Jana Cepelova vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 0-1
Urszula Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Urszula Radwanska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Urszula Radwanska won the 2011 Tashkent third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2011* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Urszula Radwanska | 6-1 6-4 | Jana Cepelova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Cepelova | Urszula Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |