H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Angelika Roesch H2H: 1-0
Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Angelika Roesch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jana Nejedly | 6-4 7-5 | Angelika Roesch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Angelika Roesch | #819 | #69 | 514 | 1,552 | 10 | 27 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Angelika Roesch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #81 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #210 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |