H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Robin White H2H: 0-1
Robin White holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robin White leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin White won the 1994 Indian Wells third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1994* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Robin White | 6-2 6-0 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Robin White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |