H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Daniela Marzano H2H: 1-0
Janet Newberry holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Marzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1978 Rome third round 6-7 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1978* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-7 6-1 6-4 | Daniela Marzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Daniela Marzano | — | — | — | 1,599 | 37 | 70 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Daniela Marzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,374 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |