H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 0-2
Florenta Mihai holds a 2–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1979 Pittsburgh third round UNK.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1979* | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Florenta Mihai | UNK | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | SF | Clay | Florenta Mihai | 7-6 6-3 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,803 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |