H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Janet Newberry vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 0-2

Florenta Mihai holds a 2–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1979 Pittsburgh round of 32 UNK.

USA Age 73 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florenta Mihai UNK Janet Newberry Match data Sep 13, 1979* R32 Pittsburgh WTA 250
Florenta Mihai 7-6 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data Jun 4, 1977* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janet Newberry 1,922 238 187 56.0% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Florenta Mihai 1,799 89 90 49.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janet Newberry Florenta Mihai
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1968 7–5 58.3% 1,542 0 0
15 1969 13–6 68.4% 1,631 0 2
16 1970 20–7 74.1% 1,718 0 5
17 1971 15–9 62.5% 1,757 0 5
18 1972 20–17 54.1% 1,707 0 5 1974 3–2 60.0% 1,515 0 0
19 1973 32–24 57.1% 1,851 0 5 1975 4–5 44.4% 1,508 0 0
20 1974 22–22 50.0% 1,812 0 5 1976 13–16 44.8% 1,634 0 0
21 1975 31–22 58.5% 1,903 0 6 1977 16–13 55.2% 1,774 0 1
22 1976 14–10 58.3% 1,862 0 6 1978 7–20 25.9% 1,642 0 1
23 1977 25–22 53.2% 1,875 0 7 1979 7–9 43.8% 1,615 0 1
24 1978 15–14 51.7% 1,831 0 7 1980 7–9 43.8% 1,578 0 1
25 1979 12–21 36.4% 1,680 0 7 1981 30–13 69.8% 1,652 0 3
26 1980 12–8 60.0% 1,643 0 8 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,618 0 3
27 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,624 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janet Newberry Florenta Mihai
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1968 7 5 12 58.3%
15 1969 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
16 1970 15 3 18 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
17 1971 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7%
18 1972 6 4 10 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1974 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1973 6 5 11 54.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 9 9 18 50.0% 1976 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1975 7 5 12 58.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1979 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1981 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 0 4 100.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 73 50 123 59.3% 72 48 120 60.0% 60 41 101 59.4% 28 43 71 39.4% 3 10 13 23.1% 39 27 66 59.1% 7 15 22 31.8% 9 22 31 29.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janet Newberry Florenta Mihai
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1968 1542 104.3 +45 55.6% +0.41 2–1 (67%) +0.69
15 1969 1632 120.1 +106 -86 67.4% +1.19 2–3 (40%) +1.11
16 1970 1719 128.8 +177 -163 -147 70.0% +1.70 4–4 (50%) 0–1 +3.95
17 1971 1758 132.0 +111 -30 56.9% +0.65 4–1 (80%) +0.89
18 1972 1707 131.6 +164 -98 -1 54.3% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–2 -0.95 1974 1516 105.0 +18 63.6% +1.18 0–1 0–1 +1.34
19 1973 1852 140.9 -29 -44 -119 55.8% +0.08 11–8 (58%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 -4.59 1975 1509 103.6 50.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 +1.56
20 1974 1813 140.5 -4 -63 -20 50.5% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -2.47 1976 1634 124.5 -65 +1 -51 41.8% -0.45 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 107.6 +0.91
21 1975 1904 152.7 -63 +15 -117 57.6% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 6–1 (86%) 104.5 -5.60 1977 1774 133.4 -215 +53 52.9% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 106.6 +0.88
22 1976 1863 123.7 -83 +57 -40 51.8% -0.23 7–1 (88%) 3–1 (75%) 107.1 -1.77 1978 1643 119.2 -37 +89 -110 25.9% -1.90 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.0 -1.87
23 1977 1875 146.0 -74 +55 -101 52.8% +0.28 6–6 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 95.9 -3.22 1979 1615 118.8 -69 -31 43.3% -0.43 1–1 0–1 +0.94
24 1978 1831 138.7 -69 +30 +11 50.7% +0.12 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) 95.6 -2.30 1980 1579 102.2 +168 -47 47.5% -0.47 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.23
25 1979 1681 129.3 +2 +125 +112 39.1% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.3 +0.41 1981 1652 129.6 +130 67.7% +1.51 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 +2.54
26 1980 1644 112.8 -10 +207 60.0% +0.76 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +2.97 1982 1618 104.2 +106 50.0% +0.38 0–2 +0.59
27 1983 1625 105.5 40.0% -1.80 1–0 +0.05
Career 1922 142.9 +13 +8 -28 54.9% +0.32 62–49 (56%) 28–25 (53%) 101.7 -2.59 1800 126.9 -97 +66 -73 49.3% -0.08 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 101.3 +4.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.