H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-3
Marita Redondo holds a 3–1 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1973 Portland semifinal 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 70
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1973* | Portland | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| May 12, 1972* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Marita Redondo | 6-1 7-6 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1970* | San Diego March of Dimes 2 | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Janet Newberry | 8-6 6-1 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1969* | San Diego Metro | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Marita Redondo | 6-3 6-1 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |