H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Janet Newberry vs Pam Shriver H2H: 0-2

Pam Shriver holds a 2–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1979 Adelaide fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janet Newberry
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 14, 1979* Adelaide WTA 500 R16 Grass Pam Shriver 6-3 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data
Nov 29, 1979* Melbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Pam Shriver 6-4 6-0 Janet Newberry Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Janet Newberry — — — 1,919 238 187 56.0% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janet Newberry Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1968 7–5 58.3% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1969 13–6 68.4% — 1,645 0 2 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1970 20–7 74.1% — 1,726 0 5 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1971 15–9 62.5% — 1,765 0 5 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1972 20–17 54.1% — 1,707 0 5 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1973 32–24 57.1% — 1,851 0 5 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1974 22–22 50.0% — 1,810 0 5 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1975 31–22 58.5% — 1,899 0 6 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1976 14–10 58.3% — 1,859 0 6 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1977 25–22 53.2% — 1,873 0 7 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1978 15–14 51.7% — 1,831 0 7 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1979 12–21 36.4% — 1,679 0 7 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1980 12–8 60.0% — 1,631 0 8 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 — — — — — — — 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 — — — — — — — 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 — — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24