H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 0-1
Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2004 Memphis third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004* | Memphis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gisela Dulko | 7-5 6-3 | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gisela Dulko | #305 | #26 | 1,695 | 1,798 | 192 | 179 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarmila Wolfe | Gisela Dulko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #154 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #125 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #33 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #26 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #59 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #51 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,604 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |