H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Naomi Broady H2H: 0-1
Naomi Broady holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naomi Broady leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2015 Washington third round 3-6 7-5 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 36
Right-Handed
189 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2015* | Washington | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Naomi Broady | 3-6 7-5 7-6(6) | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Naomi Broady | #1,209 | #76 | 875 | 1,604 | 24 | 41 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarmila Wolfe | Naomi Broady | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #117 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #250 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |