H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Anastasia Potapova H2H: 2-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Potapova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2026 Indian Wells second round 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2024* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2024* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 7-5 0-6 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |