H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jasmine Paolini and Danka Kovinic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2022 Parma quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | 6-4 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Oct 1, 2022* | QF | Parma | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-1 | Danka Kovinic | Match data | Jul 28, 2022* | R32 | Warsaw | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Danka Kovinic | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Jan 27, 2018 | Q1 | St. Petersburg | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 124 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #71 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #150 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2020 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2022 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2023 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2024 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2025 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 104 | 81 | 185 | 56.2% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 35 | 72 | 107 | 32.7% | 50 | 46 | 96 | 52.1% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 188/207 of Danka Kovinic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2/4 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 55.0% | 57.3% | 52.0% | 65.2% | 50.0% | 55.9% | 45.4% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 14/18 | 3.7 | 5.7 | 51.1% | 67.8% | 44.2% | 54.0% | 43.4% | 56.2% | 40.3% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 20/29 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 56.8% | 65.8% | 53.1% | 48.2% | 46.4% | 60.0% | 38.8% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2016 | 38/41 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 52.2% | 65.7% | 48.0% | 54.6% | 50.3% | 57.6% | 41.9% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2017 | 19/19 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 53.8% | 59.7% | 40.7% | 52.5% | 41.1% | 51.0% | 39.9% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2018 | 8/8 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 54.9% | 62.5% | 40.5% | 42.1% | 40.9% | 52.7% | 39.4% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2019 | 5/5 | 2.4 | 7.4 | 59.7% | 60.2% | 42.0% | 55.2% | 63.4% | 52.9% | 43.8% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 2020 | 12/12 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 58.4% | 69.7% | 41.9% | 54.5% | 47.4% | 59.0% | 39.8% |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | 2021 | 29/30 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 52.5% | 59.1% | 43.8% | 43.4% | 54.5% | 51.8% | 41.9% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | 2022 | 20/20 | 3.0 | 4.9 | 51.6% | 62.2% | 41.5% | 52.7% | 46.6% | 52.1% | 39.4% |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | 2023 | 19/19 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 57.7% | 64.5% | 42.4% | 50.2% | 54.5% | 54.6% | 43.3% |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 27/29 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 67.8% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.9% | 46.2% | 56.5% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 59.9% | 45.3% | 25.1% | 12.5% | 54.8% | 37.4% | 42.0% |
| Career | — | 293/315 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 67.2% | 60.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 48.5% | 55.9% | 44.3% | — | 188/210 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 54.1% | 63.4% | 44.5% | 50.4% | 48.9% | 54.8% | 40.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1512 | 105.6 | -0.09 | -0.79 | 1.028 | 50.4% | — | +61 | — | 45.5% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.28 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1459 | 99.7 | -1.02 | -2.74 | 0.921 | 48.4% | -5 | +95 | — | 38.6% | -0.52 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.1 | +1.27 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1611 | 119.5 | +1.23 | -1.90 | 0.970 | 49.1% | -90 | +28 | — | 52.3% | +0.22 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–2 (33%) | 105.0 | -0.31 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2016 | 1571 | 121.1 | +1.05 | -0.55 | 0.987 | 49.9% | -60 | +117 | — | 46.2% | -0.26 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.4 | -0.03 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2017 | 1453 | 98.5 | -3.39 | -2.67 | 0.813 | 45.8% | +3 | +129 | — | 18.4% | -1.58 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–8 (0%) | 91.9 | +0.40 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2018 | 1518 | 106.0 | -1.79 | -2.54 | 0.832 | 45.9% | — | +59 | — | 36.8% | -1.32 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.15 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2019 | 1566 | 103.9 | -0.76 | -0.72 | 0.932 | 49.2% | -43 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | 2020 | 1633 | 123.6 | +1.55 | -0.81 | 0.969 | 49.6% | -122 | +85 | — | 46.4% | -0.29 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.18 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | 2021 | 1587 | 117.6 | -3.32 | -0.37 | 0.869 | 46.9% | -131 | +176 | — | 41.0% | -0.95 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.6 | -1.02 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | 2022 | 1686 | 120.8 | -2.62 | -1.70 | 0.821 | 46.1% | -179 | +154 | — | 40.4% | -0.91 | 6–1 (86%) | 0–3 (0%) | 105.3 | -0.27 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | 2023 | 1628 | 123.5 | -2.04 | -0.40 | 0.953 | 49.1% | -99 | +136 | — | 46.2% | -0.03 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | -0.17 |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | 2024 | 1621 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.80 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +24 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 | 2025 | 1609 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.50 | — | — | — | +0.25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1542 | 98.8 | -1.17 | -0.84 | 0.671 | 39.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 | — | 1756 | 118.4 | -1.08 | -1.26 | 0.906 | 48.0% | -79 | +104 | — | 41.8% | -0.55 | 33–29 (53%) | 11–26 (30%) | 99.6 | +0.24 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jul 29, 2024 | H2H |
| Lauren Davis | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 26, 2022 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 30, 2022 | H2H |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 28, 2021 | H2H |