H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-1
Jasmine Paolini and Danka Kovinic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2022 Parma quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2022* | Parma | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 6-4 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2022* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-1 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
| Jan 27, 2018 | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |