H2H data updated: 2026-11-01 00:00 UTC

Jasmine Paolini vs Donna Vekic H2H: 2-1

Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Wimbledon semifinal 2-6 6-4 7-6(8).

Italy Age 30 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jasmine Paolini #7 2-6 6-4 7-6(8) Donna Vekic #37 Match data Jul 13, 2024* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jasmine Paolini #50 7-6(3) 6-2 Donna Vekic #22 Match data Aug 9, 2023* R64 Canadian Open WTA 1000 Hard
Donna Vekic #97 6-2 6-0 Jasmine Paolini #56 Match data Oct 30, 2021* SF Courmayeur WTA 250 Hard
Jasmine Paolini #98 7-6(2) 6-2 Donna Vekic #56 Match data Aug 15, 2021 Q2 Q Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jasmine Paolini #35 #4 5,865 2,056 179 142 55.8% 0 2 0 0 1 3
Donna Vekic #36 #17 2,458 1,933 244 242 50.2% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jasmine Paolini Donna Vekic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1
21 2017 0–2 0.0% #140 1,453 0 0 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2
22 2018 3–5 37.5% #192 1,498 0 0 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2
23 2019 6–9 40.0% #96 1,587 0 0 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2
24 2020 4–8 33.3% #96 1,550 0 0 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2
25 2021 20–19 51.3% #53 1,769 0 1 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3
26 2022 22–20 52.4% #62 1,742 0 1 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3
27 2023 25–23 52.1% #30 1,847 0 1 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4
28 2024 40–19 67.8% #4 1,973 0 2 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4
29 2025 40–20 66.7% #8 2,004 0 3 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,743 0 4
30 2026 19–17 52.8% #35 1,873 0 3 2026 13–16 44.8% #36 1,727 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jasmine Paolini Donna Vekic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6%
23 2019 2 3 5 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2021 17 13 30 56.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2023 19 15 34 55.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 2024 20 12 32 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3%
29 2025 24 14 38 63.2% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2026 12 11 23 52.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 2026 3 11 14 21.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
Career — 107 85 192 55.7% 57 45 102 55.9% 15 12 27 55.6% — 150 165 315 47.6% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 300/322 of Jasmine Paolini's and 448/487 of Donna Vekic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jasmine Paolini Donna Vekic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3%
21 2017 2/2 0.0 3.0 57.7% 43.8% 38.8% 63.0% 0.0% 40.4% 28.4% 2017 36/37 4.0 5.3 56.0% 65.3% 45.8% 58.3% 47.7% 56.5% 40.6%
22 2018 8/8 0.4 1.6 66.1% 52.3% 45.2% 51.3% 50.3% 50.2% 43.5% 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4%
23 2019 15/15 0.7 3.2 66.2% 56.5% 45.9% 54.7% 50.4% 52.8% 41.7% 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0%
24 2020 12/12 0.7 2.9 63.6% 54.1% 41.6% 49.3% 44.2% 49.7% 47.1% 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5%
25 2021 38/39 0.9 2.5 66.3% 59.5% 45.8% 55.3% 49.1% 54.9% 43.2% 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1%
26 2022 40/42 0.8 2.3 66.5% 59.5% 46.8% 53.2% 49.7% 55.4% 43.9% 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5%
27 2023 47/48 0.9 1.8 68.3% 59.0% 48.4% 51.4% 45.2% 55.7% 43.5% 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6%
28 2024 53/59 1.3 1.8 67.8% 63.6% 47.8% 52.9% 52.6% 58.5% 45.8% 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1%
29 2025 51/61 1.3 1.5 68.1% 62.2% 49.5% 52.0% 49.2% 57.9% 45.7% 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1%
30 2026 34/36 1.5 2.4 67.2% 59.5% 47.6% 57.3% 47.1% 55.4% 44.4% 2026 28/29 3.7 4.6 58.2% 66.2% 44.7% 55.2% 41.2% 57.3% 40.7%
Career — 300/322 1.1 2.1 67.1% 59.9% 47.3% 53.3% 48.7% 55.8% 44.3% — 448/487 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.6% 44.8% 50.3% 48.8% 57.5% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jasmine Paolini Donna Vekic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 100.6 -0.23
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62
20 2016 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1563 112.9 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 -0.76
21 2017 1454 95.0 -0.81 -0.44 0.476 36.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.39 2017 1671 127.8 +0.13 -1.26 0.933 48.8% -43 -178 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 94.6 -0.64
22 2018 1499 110.7 -1.60 -1.28 0.874 47.0% — +21 — 37.5% -0.88 — 1–1 — +0.11 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -51 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) 92.6 +0.05
23 2019 1587 114.9 -2.75 -0.55 0.884 47.2% -71 +39 — 37.1% -1.12 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.63 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) 89.1 +1.18
24 2020 1550 117.8 -2.87 +2.21 0.937 48.4% -99 +114 — 33.3% -0.85 2–1 (67%) — — -0.53 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.62
25 2021 1770 129.3 -1.17 -0.08 0.958 49.4% -55 -35 — 47.8% -0.30 9–5 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 110.2 -0.03 2021 1761 140.6 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 97.9 -0.11
26 2022 1742 131.6 -1.55 +0.45 0.984 49.9% -12 +2 — 50.5% +0.13 11–10 (52%) 2–7 (22%) 98.4 -0.51 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.92
27 2023 1848 138.9 -0.40 +0.93 0.981 49.6% -23 -12 -324 47.7% -0.21 10–5 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 106.5 -1.68 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 104.1 -0.44
28 2024 1973 157.6 +2.06 +3.44 1.105 52.2% -50 -12 -140 63.3% +0.79 9–9 (50%) 11–3 (79%) 105.7 +0.64 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -94 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) 100.0 -0.31
29 2025 2004 161.2 +1.61 +2.90 1.085 52.0% -5 +75 -156 62.4% +0.67 10–5 (67%) 8–5 (62%) 106.0 +1.91 2025 1743 136.0 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +5 +20 +153 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.9 +0.97
30 2026 1874 142.8 -0.90 +1.09 0.994 50.0% +6 +103 +37 50.0% +0.06 9–5 (64%) 2–7 (22%) 97.0 +1.99 2026 1727 138.6 +0.70 -0.83 0.952 49.0% -59 +98 +214 47.1% -0.21 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) 98.6 +0.12
Career — 2057 145.0 -0.18 +1.44 1.002 50.2% -27 +29 -123 52.3% +0.09 64–41 (61%) 34–30 (53%) 110.8 +0.28 — 1933 141.3 +0.83 +0.33 1.012 50.2% -15 -74 +84 50.4% +0.10 75–87 (46%) 59–77 (43%) 94.1 +0.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.