H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Donna Vekic H2H: 2-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Wimbledon semifinal 2-6 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | SF | Grass | Jasmine Paolini | 2-6 6-4 7-6(8) | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(3) 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2021* | Courmayeur | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-2 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2021 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |