H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Irina-Camelia Begu H2H: 1-2
Irina-Camelia Begu holds a 2–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Irina-Camelia Begu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina-Camelia Begu won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 4-6 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Irina-Camelia Begu | 4-6 6-1 7-6(5) | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2022* | Melbourne 2 | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Irina-Camelia Begu | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2019* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | Irina-Camelia Begu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | #204 | #22 | 1,925 | 1,886 | 249 | 234 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Irina-Camelia Begu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #40 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #41 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #29 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #43 | 1,667 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #34 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #75 | 1,781 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,807 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #144 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,726 | 0 | 6 |