H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:34 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Jelena Ostapenko H2H: 1-3
Jelena Ostapenko holds a 3–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jelena Ostapenko leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2026 Miami third round 5-7 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Ostapenko | 5-7 6-2 7-5 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| May 12, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 7-5 6-2 | Jelena Ostapenko | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2025 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-2 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Jelena Ostapenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |