H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Karolina Pliskova H2H: 1-1
Jasmine Paolini and Karolina Pliskova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 US Open second round RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 34
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2024* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | RET | Karolina Pliskova | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Karolina Pliskova | 6-0 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Karolina Pliskova | #64 | #1 | 6,940 | 2,041 | 421 | 241 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #736 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #465 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #118 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #4 | 1,930 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #2 | 1,975 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #6 | 1,914 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #4 | 1,972 | 0 | 16 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,834 | 0 | 16 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #38 | 1,759 | 0 | 16 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #41 | 1,777 | 0 | 17 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #64 | 1,879 | 0 | 17 |