H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Jasmine Paolini holds a 4–1 lead over Katie Boulter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2026 Mérida Open quarterfinal 0-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 0-6 6-3 6-3 | Katie Boulter | Match data | Feb 28, 2026 | QF | Mérida Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-2 | Katie Boulter | Match data | Apr 25, 2025 | R64 | Madrid Open | WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 7-6(0) | Katie Boulter | Match data | Jun 29, 2024* | QF | Eastbourne Open | WTA 500 | Grass |
| Katie Boulter | 6-2 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Feb 1, 2024* | R32 | Linz Open | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-2 | Katie Boulter | Match data | Mar 11, 2022* | R128 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #35 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 179 | 142 | 55.8% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Katie Boulter | #48 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,858 | 100 | 99 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,752 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,004 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #48 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #35 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2023 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2024 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2025 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2026 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 107 | 85 | 192 | 55.7% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 58 | 65 | 123 | 47.2% | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 36 | 22 | 58 | 62.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 300/322 of Jasmine Paolini's and 189/199 of Katie Boulter's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 57.5% | 68.0% | 43.2% | 44.4% | 50.0% | 57.5% | 38.4% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2018 | 12/14 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 57.6% | 63.2% | 48.6% | 49.8% | 43.7% | 56.6% | 39.4% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2019 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 4.8 | 57.0% | 73.0% | 43.6% | 62.8% | 41.0% | 60.2% | 36.6% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2020 | 3/3 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 52.9% | 64.6% | 48.7% | 51.9% | 66.3% | 56.7% | 37.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2021 | 18/18 | 2.8 | 4.5 | 57.4% | 64.7% | 49.2% | 55.7% | 46.3% | 57.9% | 40.6% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 2022 | 17/17 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 60.0% | 69.4% | 40.6% | 53.2% | 47.5% | 57.9% | 39.5% |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | 2023 | 21/21 | 3.9 | 5.2 | 58.0% | 67.7% | 43.8% | 59.7% | 49.1% | 58.0% | 43.6% |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | 2024 | 48/49 | 3.6 | 5.3 | 56.3% | 72.2% | 45.5% | 54.3% | 46.4% | 60.7% | 42.8% |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | 2025 | 24/29 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 59.0% | 62.3% | 39.7% | 47.0% | 50.3% | 53.4% | 41.0% |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | 2026 | 40/42 | 1.9 | 5.5 | 59.6% | 66.4% | 40.6% | 50.1% | 49.2% | 56.4% | 43.1% |
| 30 | 2026 | 34/36 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 67.2% | 59.5% | 47.6% | 57.3% | 47.1% | 55.4% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 300/322 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 67.1% | 59.9% | 47.3% | 53.3% | 48.7% | 55.8% | 44.3% | — | 189/199 | 3.1 | 5.0 | 58.0% | 67.6% | 43.6% | 53.0% | 47.9% | 57.7% | 41.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1493 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1483 | 99.7 | +1.01 | -1.68 | 0.903 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2018 | 1594 | 115.0 | -0.12 | -1.06 | 0.907 | 47.7% | -26 | — | +22 | 45.5% | -0.70 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–0 | — | -0.32 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2019 | 1612 | 118.1 | +1.64 | -0.86 | 0.919 | 48.0% | -15 | — | — | 41.7% | -0.50 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2020 | 1613 | 109.1 | -0.24 | -1.93 | 0.856 | 47.8% | -3 | — | — | 28.6% | -0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2021 | 1629 | 122.0 | +0.87 | -1.11 | 0.965 | 49.3% | -39 | — | +50 | 47.5% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | -0.81 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.3 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | 2022 | 1738 | 131.0 | +0.12 | -1.36 | 0.939 | 49.0% | -68 | — | +130 | 53.8% | 0.00 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–1 (80%) | 106.4 | -0.69 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | 2023 | 1738 | 126.8 | +0.54 | +0.56 | 1.039 | 51.1% | -58 | — | +162 | 52.1% | +0.40 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 99.1 | +1.53 |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | 2024 | 1823 | 146.2 | +3.23 | -0.07 | 1.090 | 51.5% | +13 | -317 | +185 | 55.8% | +0.58 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–7 (36%) | 102.5 | +1.02 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -12 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | 2025 | 1753 | 130.9 | -2.49 | -0.85 | 0.879 | 47.3% | -20 | -102 | +240 | 38.0% | -0.80 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–4 (43%) | 100.8 | -1.87 |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.5 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -156 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | 2026 | 1792 | 142.2 | -0.27 | +0.31 | 0.987 | 49.7% | +17 | -147 | +123 | 51.0% | +0.11 | 10–5 (67%) | 4–5 (44%) | 104.1 | -1.39 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1874 | 142.8 | -0.89 | +1.09 | 0.994 | 50.0% | +7 | +103 | +37 | 50.0% | +0.06 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–7 (22%) | 97.0 | +1.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2057 | 145.3 | -0.18 | +1.44 | 1.002 | 50.2% | -26 | +29 | -123 | 52.3% | +0.09 | 65–41 (61%) | 34–30 (53%) | 111.0 | +0.27 | — | 1859 | 138.7 | +0.64 | -0.36 | 0.986 | 49.7% | -10 | -172 | +139 | 49.0% | -0.03 | 40–28 (59%) | 21–23 (48%) | 106.4 | -1.42 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 4 | 5 | Feb 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jun 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 10, 2024 | H2H |
| Viktorija Golubic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Oct 21, 2026 | H2H |