H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Kristina Mladenovic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jasmine Paolini vs Kristina Mladenovic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |