H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Leylah Fernandez H2H: 2-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Leylah Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Bad Homburg fourth round 7-6(8) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 23
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2025 | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2024* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-4 | Leylah Fernandez | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2023 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-2 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2021* | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Leylah Fernandez | 6-4 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Leylah Fernandez | #25 | #13 | 2,605 | 1,929 | 145 | 119 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Leylah Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #434 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #88 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #31 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #22 | 1,909 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #25 | 1,754 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |