H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Liudmila Samsonova H2H: 0-2
Liudmila Samsonova holds a 2–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Liudmila Samsonova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liudmila Samsonova won the 2025 Indian Wells fourth round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-0 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-2 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2019 | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Liudmila Samsonova | 6-7(4) 6-0 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Liudmila Samsonova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |