H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Magda Linette H2H: 1-2
Magda Linette holds a 2–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magda Linette leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Miami quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-2 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-4 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2023* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Magda Linette | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |