H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Mandy Minella H2H: 0-1
Mandy Minella holds a 1–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mandy Minella leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mandy Minella won the 2019 Prague third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
LUX
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mandy Minella | 6-3 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mandy Minella | #787 | #66 | 955 | 1,644 | 58 | 102 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Mandy Minella | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #110 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #77 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #168 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #141 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #262 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |