H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Marta Kostyuk H2H: 2-1
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Marta Kostyuk in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Marta Kostyuk leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marta Kostyuk won the 2026 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 24
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Marta Kostyuk | 6-3 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2023* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-2 6-1 | Marta Kostyuk | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2022* | Transylvania Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Marta Kostyuk | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2022 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Marta Kostyuk | 6-2 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Marta Kostyuk | #11 | #11 | 3,926 | 2,110 | 150 | 113 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Marta Kostyuk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #119 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #50 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #26 | 1,892 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 27–6 | 81.8% | #11 | 2,090 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |