H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 2-3
Ons Jabeur holds a 3–2 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–1 on clay, while Ons Jabeur leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2025 Berlin fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2025 | Berlin | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Ons Jabeur | 6-1 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| May 10, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-4 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2024* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2023* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Ons Jabeur | 6-3 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 7-6(9) 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |