H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Qinwen Zheng H2H: 0-4
Qinwen Zheng holds a 4–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2024 Riyadh Finals round-robin match 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024 | Riyadh Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-1 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2023* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-2 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2023* | Palermo | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Qinwen Zheng | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Qinwen Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |