H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Tamara Zidansek H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2019 Guangzhou third round 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 28
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2019* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Tamara Zidansek | #148 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,800 | 83 | 92 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #148 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |