H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Madrid second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AND
Age 20
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-0 6-1 | Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | #114 | #89 | 841 | 1,721 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |