H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Xinyu Wang H2H: 1-1
Jasmine Paolini and Xinyu Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on clay, while Xinyu Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Xinyu Wang won the 2023 Cleveland fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 24
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2023* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Xinyu Wang | 6-4 6-3 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| May 11, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Jasmine Paolini | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Xinyu Wang | #40 | #30 | 1,581 | 1,857 | 105 | 121 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Xinyu Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #86 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #40 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |