H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 4-1

Jelena Jankovic holds a 4–1 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2010 Stuttgart third round 6-2 6-2.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 29, 2010* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Jelena Jankovic #7 6-2 6-2 Gisela Dulko #34 Match data
May 7, 2009* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 6-3 7-6(6) Gisela Dulko #39 Match data
Mar 25, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Gisela Dulko #35 6-4 7-6(5) Jelena Jankovic #3 Match data
Aug 30, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jelena Jankovic #20 6-7(2) 6-1 6-4 Gisela Dulko #39 Match data
Jun 14, 2004 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R32 Grass Jelena Jankovic #52 6-1 6-1 Gisela Dulko #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15