H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Jing-Jing Lu H2H: 0-1
Jing-Jing Lu holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jing-Jing Lu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jing-Jing Lu won the 2017 Nanchang fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jing-Jing Lu | 2-6 6-1 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Jing-Jing Lu | #797 | #159 | 365 | 1,550 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Jankovic | Jing-Jing Lu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |