H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jelena Jankovic holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2010 Australian Open second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 6-2 6-2 | Katie Obrien | Match data | Jan 21, 2010* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,138 | 552 | 337 | 62.1% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Jankovic | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #28 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,390 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,370 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #1 | 2,091 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,365 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,797 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,797 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,575 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jelena Jankovic | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 17 | 19 | 36 | 47.2% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2007 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2008 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 38 | 18 | 56 | 67.9% | 23 | 5 | 28 | 82.1% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2010 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 49 | 15 | 64 | 76.6% | 14 | 3 | 17 | 82.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 51.5% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 27 | 15 | 42 | 64.3% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 26 | 18 | 44 | 59.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 21 | 6 | 27 | 77.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | 14 | 36 | 61.1% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 348 | 225 | 573 | 60.7% | 146 | 73 | 219 | 66.7% | 53 | 32 | 85 | 62.4% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | Career | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 3 | 15 | 18 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 647/868 of Jelena Jankovic's and 31/42 of Katie Obrien's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Jelena Jankovic | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2004 | 5/53 | 1.0 | 8.6 | 68.2% | 57.5% | 34.2% | 47.2% | 52.3% | 50.5% | 49.0% | 2005 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 51.2% | 63.6% | 47.6% | 0.0% | — | 55.8% | 20.0% |
| 2005 | 9/65 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 65.5% | 66.3% | 40.5% | 58.7% | 57.0% | 57.4% | 45.4% | 2006 | 2/3 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 58.1% | 57.7% | 42.1% | 37.9% | 62.5% | 51.1% | 42.8% |
| 2006 | 46/73 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 67.7% | 62.7% | 43.4% | 50.1% | 49.7% | 56.6% | 46.1% | 2007 | 4/7 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 55.7% | 62.5% | 36.7% | 44.9% | 36.4% | 51.4% | 42.2% |
| 2007 | 87/99 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 70.3% | 65.5% | 46.9% | 48.7% | 51.9% | 59.9% | 50.5% | 2008 | 6/10 | 1.5 | 6.7 | 54.5% | 62.6% | 43.3% | 54.5% | 42.0% | 53.7% | 42.6% |
| 2008 | 69/85 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 69.2% | 65.0% | 46.8% | 57.5% | 56.7% | 59.5% | 49.0% | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.2 | 6.6 | 59.0% | 54.7% | 35.8% | 45.2% | 44.2% | 46.9% | 39.4% |
| 2009 | 53/61 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 63.7% | 64.2% | 49.0% | 53.7% | 51.3% | 58.7% | 47.8% | 2010 | 8/10 | 1.6 | 6.3 | 59.5% | 54.8% | 39.7% | 41.7% | 33.7% | 49.0% | 37.8% |
| 2010 | 51/57 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 65.3% | 63.1% | 46.0% | 53.7% | 54.0% | 57.2% | 47.6% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 62.9% | 46.2% | 30.4% | 41.7% | 60.0% | 40.3% | 37.5% |
| 2011 | 53/60 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 63.9% | 66.8% | 47.8% | 50.7% | 48.4% | 60.0% | 48.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 53/59 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 60.5% | 63.6% | 43.8% | 55.9% | 48.2% | 56.1% | 46.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 62/67 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 62.0% | 63.7% | 46.5% | 55.7% | 50.7% | 57.1% | 47.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 56/60 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 63.2% | 66.5% | 49.0% | 57.1% | 50.7% | 59.7% | 47.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 41/60 | 3.2 | 4.0 | 63.4% | 64.1% | 52.6% | 53.5% | 47.2% | 59.9% | 41.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 37/44 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 62.2% | 65.3% | 45.6% | 58.3% | 52.0% | 57.9% | 47.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25/25 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 60.6% | 61.5% | 42.6% | 54.0% | 57.1% | 54.2% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 647/889 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 65.0% | 64.5% | 46.7% | 53.9% | 51.5% | 58.3% | 47.2% | Career | 31/43 | 1.5 | 6.2 | 57.6% | 57.5% | 39.0% | 44.0% | 40.3% | 49.7% | 39.5% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jelena Jankovic | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2001 | 1512 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | 2004 | 1492 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.06 |
| 2002 | 1529 | 120.6 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.79 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.14 | 2005 | 1492 | 103.3 | +4.63 | +2.47 | 0.453 | 37.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.29 |
| 2003 | 1488 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | +49 | -9 | — | 39.3% | -0.36 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–2 | — | +0.62 | 2006 | 1462 | 94.0 | -0.38 | +0.43 | 0.876 | 47.0% | — | — | +15 | 25.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.02 |
| 2004 | 1746 | 139.9 | -1.12 | +2.19 | 0.989 | 49.7% | -43 | -137 | -129 | 53.7% | +0.12 | 8–11 (42%) | 11–2 (85%) | 107.5 | -0.93 | 2007 | 1502 | 98.4 | -1.08 | -1.93 | 0.868 | 46.8% | +35 | — | +18 | 53.3% | -0.33 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.89 |
| 2005 | 1733 | 142.6 | +1.39 | +0.98 | 1.067 | 51.2% | -36 | -21 | -3 | 56.8% | +0.58 | 9–15 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 91.2 | -0.92 | 2008 | 1451 | 98.3 | -1.41 | -1.77 | 0.920 | 48.4% | +67 | — | +20 | 30.8% | -1.19 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.44 |
| 2006 | 1925 | 155.2 | +0.93 | +2.16 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -25 | -178 | -93 | 62.0% | +0.98 | 16–10 (62%) | 8–9 (47%) | 105.8 | -1.57 | 2009 | 1391 | 89.7 | -5.01 | -2.96 | 0.742 | 43.3% | +96 | +66 | — | 21.7% | -2.04 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +0.39 |
| 2007 | 1977 | 166.7 | +4.61 | +7.29 | 1.259 | 54.9% | -66 | +125 | -9 | 71.8% | +1.76 | 15–14 (52%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.5 | -2.33 | 2010 | 1371 | 97.5 | -2.84 | -3.79 | 0.741 | 43.8% | +103 | +65 | — | 29.2% | -1.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.42 |
| 2008 | 2091 | 167.1 | +4.57 | +5.72 | 1.211 | 54.2% | 0 | +6 | -122 | 72.3% | +1.59 | 14–12 (54%) | 9–6 (60%) | 97.6 | -0.03 | 2011 | 1366 | 99.1 | -2.49 | -4.08 | 0.628 | 39.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 2009 | 1953 | 153.9 | +3.33 | +4.18 | 1.158 | 53.2% | +35 | +106 | -56 | 65.7% | +0.99 | 10–10 (50%) | 13–6 (68%) | 96.3 | +1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1797 | 148.2 | +1.63 | +4.10 | 1.111 | 52.3% | -26 | +268 | +127 | 59.5% | +0.69 | 11–5 (69%) | 6–6 (50%) | 98.9 | +1.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1795 | 152.5 | +3.98 | +4.60 | 1.215 | 54.2% | -5 | +179 | — | 63.5% | +1.32 | 6–15 (29%) | 3–2 (60%) | 89.2 | +2.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1733 | 140.2 | +0.76 | +2.74 | 1.061 | 51.2% | +44 | +108 | +82 | 51.6% | +0.25 | 6–10 (38%) | 8–11 (42%) | 90.7 | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1921 | 155.5 | +1.91 | +3.65 | 1.103 | 52.2% | -10 | +25 | — | 63.4% | +0.98 | 17–10 (63%) | 12–6 (67%) | 108.0 | +2.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1797 | 152.0 | +3.44 | +3.23 | 1.165 | 53.1% | +32 | +152 | — | 63.1% | +1.09 | 6–8 (43%) | 5–9 (36%) | 91.3 | +1.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1858 | 140.4 | +1.72 | +0.71 | 1.039 | 50.5% | +8 | +11 | -27 | 61.7% | +0.75 | 15–6 (71%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.0 | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1730 | 132.2 | +1.48 | +2.78 | 1.125 | 52.4% | +42 | +35 | +71 | 56.0% | +0.52 | 4–12 (25%) | 4–5 (44%) | 86.5 | +1.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1575 | 121.7 | -1.62 | -1.81 | 0.871 | 47.5% | +83 | +113 | +164 | 34.4% | -0.87 | 2–9 (18%) | 1–4 (20%) | 88.8 | -0.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2139 | 156.2 | +2.59 | +3.80 | 1.133 | 52.7% | -3 | +72 | -8 | 61.1% | +0.87 | 142–153 (48%) | 101–88 (53%) | 93.6 | +0.58 | Career | 1514 | 93.8 | -2.56 | -2.45 | 0.785 | 44.8% | +80 | +66 | +18 | 29.4% | -1.51 | 4–12 (25%) | 5–2 (71%) | 95.3 | +4.19 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 7 | 7 | 14 | Mar 11, 2017 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 4 | 10 | 14 | Aug 16, 2014 | H2H |
| Alona Bondarenko | 13 | 1 | 14 | May 24, 2011 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 6 | 8 | 14 | Feb 26, 2011 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 6 | 7 | 13 | Jan 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alla Kudryavtseva | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 17, 2009 | H2H |
| Monica Niculescu | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 16, 2009 | H2H |
| Olga Govortsova | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 26, 2009 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 23, 2010 | H2H |