H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Na Li H2H: 4-6

Na Li holds a 6–4 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 6–1 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Na Li won the 2013 WTA Championships round-robin match 6-3 2-6 6-3.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 6
10 main draw meetings
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2013 WTA Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Na Li #5 6-3 2-6 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #8 Match data
Sep 3, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Na Li #6 6-3 6-0 Jelena Jankovic #12 Match data
May 17, 2013* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Jelena Jankovic #18 7-6(2) 7-5 Na Li #5 Match data
Oct 3, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Hard Jelena Jankovic #8 6-4 6-3 Na Li #16 Match data
Feb 13, 2009* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Jelena Jankovic #3 6-0 3-6 6-2 Na Li #28 Match data
Feb 23, 2008* Doha WTA 1000 QF Hard Na Li #29 6-3 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #4 Match data
Mar 9, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Na Li #17 6-3 7-6(1) Jelena Jankovic #9 Match data
May 27, 2006* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Jelena Jankovic #35 7-5 6-1 Na Li #39 Match data
Aug 15, 2005 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Na Li #45 6-4 5-7 6-2 Jelena Jankovic #18 Match data
Oct 1, 2004* Guangzhou WTA 250 R16 Hard Na Li #145 0-6 6-2 7-6(6) Jelena Jankovic #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,124 334 155 68.3% 2 1 0 2 4 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #136 1,499 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,483 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,601 0 1
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,711 0 1
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,801 0 1
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,814 0 1
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2008 24–12 66.7% #23 1,843 0 2
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,914 0 2
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,844 0 3
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,868 1 5
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2012 43–16 72.9% #7 2,016 1 6
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,077 1 7
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,031 2 9