H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jelena Ostapenko vs Bethanie Mattek-Sands.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Bethanie Mattek-Sands | #1,356 | #30 | 1,643 | 1,777 | 132 | 172 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Ostapenko | Bethanie Mattek-Sands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2008 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #39 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2009 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2010 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #58 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2011 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #55 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #169 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #48 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #123 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #350 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #370 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #368 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1360 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |