H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 10:32 UTC
Jelena Ostapenko vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-0
Jelena Ostapenko holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Goerges in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Ostapenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Ostapenko won the 2019 Luxembourg final 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 29
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2019* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Jelena Ostapenko | 6-4 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | #29 | #5 | 5,611 | 2,028 | 289 | 210 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Ostapenko | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #7 | 1,887 | 1 | 2 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #22 | 1,752 | 1 | 2 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,795 | 1 | 3 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #44 | 1,793 | 1 | 3 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #28 | 1,896 | 1 | 4 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,844 | 1 | 5 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #13 | 1,912 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #15 | 1,842 | 1 | 8 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #23 | 1,773 | 1 | 9 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2026 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,869 | 1 | 9 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |